We all need to better understand networks. Their importance
is growing as a form of organization whose efficiency has been enhanced by
information technology. The body of knowledge that deals with them has
mushroomed in the last ten years or so. The internet – network of networks – is
now a significant part of the life of hundreds of millions of people. The
metaphor is part of our everyday vocabulary. And still, it is used in so many
cases, to describe, refer or allude to so many situations that its
"polysemy" as Michel Callon puts it, can be easily confusing.
Networks and complexity have so many things in common that we tend to let
specialists deal with the issue, understand it, analyze it, use it.
This is wrong. Networks should not be the sole territory of
brainy scientists. We should all learn about them, take advantage of the
available knowledge about what they are, where they appear, how they operate.
[This article has been published in the first issue of the International Journal of Communication published by USC Annenberg Center]
Continue reading "Networks as a unifying pattern of life - An interview with Fritjof Capra" »
YouTube has nothing to do with journalism as we know it, but it can
teach us a couple of things that we ought to learn. Beyond the fabulous price
for which it has been bought, it reveals that many people have broadband,
produce content and publish it, while others (partly the same) are more
interested in this view of the world by “the people” than in ours. This matters
for journalism in the time of web 2.0.
W2: there is a there there
It is common (in particular among techies) to say that there is not much
in this buzzword. “Vaporware” as they love to say. This is troubling for most
of us who tend to take their word for granted when dealing with information
technologies and the web. I disagree and I use an expression coined by others
to approach the issue: "there is a there there". We better find out
what it is about, understand it and react accordingly.
[This is a slightly longuer version of the story that was published in the Nieman Report]
Continue reading "Web 2.0: what does it mean for journalism and the media?" »
When I arrived from Mexico and war-torn Central America to cover Silicon Valley I was impressed, and more than slightly
skeptical, to find millionaires with some kind of social bent. Money, of
course, matters more than revolution around here, but it is not always the
whole picture. This is not easy to understand for a foreigner (and much less to
explain as a correspondent is supposed to do).
That maybe why I
enjoyed so much reading John Markoff’s What the Dormouse said, How the 60’s
counterculture shaped the Personal Computer Industry (Viking).
San Francisco, California, 10.jul.05
Continue reading "Let’s not forget what we owe to the hippies" »
Mark Goodstein, X1's founder answered my questions about his program, how it works, the power of indexation, and why he thinks that his software "makes organization optional." I used some of his quotes in an article about indexing (in Spanish).
Continue reading ""Indexing Power," an interview with Mark Goodstein, X1's founder" »
In order to write the story on The Brain (in Spanish) I asked a few questions to Harlan Hugh, President, Chief Technology Officer and Co-Founder. He could not answer them in time and they did not appear in the story. Nevertheless, Harlan was kind enough to email his thoughts a few days later, and it seems a good idea to share them with you.
Continue reading ""Relational search," an interview with Hugh Harlan, The Brain's founder " »
John Arquilla and David Ronfeldt codified the strategy that helped the United States overthrow the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. They believe that Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida could still prevail if they got hold of weapons of mass destruction, and the US and its allies must prevent that acquisition. To do so, the US will have to change the nature of warfare.
San Francisco, California, June 1st 2002
Continue reading "'BEST STORY, NOT THE BIGGEST BOMB' - How to fight the terror networks" »
Times are changing. After the war in Kosovo some of the old
certainties inherited from the cold war are about to give way to new
military doctrines. The network - the nervous system through which
information circulates - is now the organisational paradigm. In their
research into this transformation some analysts are calling for the
United States to prepare for "cyberwar" and "netwar",
in which enemies are defeated by interrupting their command structures
and their systems of thought and communication, rather than aiming to
destroy them physically.
Published in Le Monde Diplomatique, August, 1999
Continue reading "Preparing for cyberwar; Mars gives way to Minerva" »